Another betting more (who cares ...) The Social Network
I told some friends that if I touch receive an Oscar insurance in my speech I would be in a mess, and the same would happen if he received a Nobel a Pulitzer, or in worst cases, the strange title of meritorious Son of El Salvador ... Tomorrow
delivered Oscar and there will certainly be some surprises, but if I mistake not be categorized as supporting roles and screenwriting categories. formula awards always gives the same result, and if we rely strictly on this formula for the thing does not much surprise.
awards, all are a sympathy vote. Nobody will deny that in '94 Pulp Fiction was a proposal much more powerful film Forrest Gump but in the end, the mentally retarded won us the pulse of all and say all because Mine was nice and did not bother me that the film won. Thus, we will not wait for tomorrow, suddenly, all members of the Academy ( writers, cameramen , Actors, directors, producers, extras, staff, etc ...) have been made lenses André Bazin and without sympathy vote but tastefully film.
I said before that The King 's Speech get away with statuette for Best Picture , not for its cinematic merits, but for your message. The Social Network , though I be uncomfortable is the only one who could steal the prize , I do not think the Academy is a monster apart (as Quinta Vergara ) and probably the King win this. The award for direction should be to David Fincher , his work in film of facebook is so good that even if you look buts excels. Darren Aronofsky is my favorite, but his work is too film for Academy . And happened to Orson Welles in 1941, although he was on a par with John Ford. style Darren not like it for good. Ironic is not it?
Natalie Portman will thank you all for the prize, in spite of Annette Bening (her performance is The kids Are all rigth is superb) or the amazing Jennifer Lawrence ( Winter 's Bone ) and Colin Firth (The Kin's Speech) will thank you for yours, because the only thing that could tie or win is Jeff Bridges ( True Grit ) and gave him and his. Javier Bardem not apply, however remarkable it is his performance in Biutiful.
So far, so clear.
The thing becomes a bit confusing in the awards for supporting roles. In my opinion the two actresses compete that category by The Fighter opens more possibilities to Hailee Steinfeld by True Grit , but Amy Adams has many supporters in the Academy so perhaps you give your speech touch appreciation for his role in that The Fighter.
And I think the real surprise of the night will be in the supporting actor category where many see Christian Bale (The Figther ) giving thanks for his award and the most condescending think Geoffrey Rush receive her second Oscar by The King 's Speech , I see the unknown John Hawkes ( Winter' s Bone ) receiving Oscar in honor of all independent film. Yes, well I see. The work of Geoffrey was easy for him and Christian is not an actor who deserves recognition, yet.
In the category of scripts , The Are kids all right (original) and The Social Network (adaptation) will win. And it's more than obvious that Toy Story 3 will be chosen.
Again I shall refrain from giving my opinion on how best a Foreign Film because I have not seen them all and would not be appropriate to say something that I have not a 60% certainty.
Finally, to end this post unimportant, I must say that Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross should win the Oscar for what they did with The Social Network . Without his music, this film would not have had the same texture. To them and Natalie I applaud standing, the only one that I'll be drooling by the Israeli girl.
Let's see if I am as certain as last year.
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Friday, February 25, 2011
All Nighter Wood Stove Review
6 000 ... ! And Now February 19
week closure and MO Nancho could not leave without reply ... the assertion of the! 64 000 pesos! (Less than 58 000 of course)
week closure and MO Nancho could not leave without reply ... the assertion of the! 64 000 pesos! (Less than 58 000 of course)
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Show The Indian Salwarsuit
I have a facebook account . My friends have accounts on facebook . Most people who access the internet and I know have a facebook account , and thus adding millions of people have an account on the network of networks , facebook.
I'll get a little hard to Network The Social because it should be.
not need an economist, mathematician or a magician to figure that executives of Columbia and Sony are motivated in that amount of simple people with a facebook account to be interested in financing a film about the origins the site. And it was.
hunting was prepared starting with the cast, which is a network for all kinds of fish: Jesse Eisenberg, who plays Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook creator , attract the public that no one wants considered but a curious fan, Andrew Garfield would trap those that are fan and for some geeks (remember that is the new Peter Parker ) and Justin Timberlake be the magnet for females. Next .
Then they had to find a writer that could move from controversy without complaint, for what that referred, in particular the owner of facebook is disgutara , not images but with the content of the film and presenting it form on screen, and then searches to Aaron Sorkin , a respected writer who likes to put memorable lines in the mouths of characters of their film, that is, a painter of letters that makes it seem so simple and beautiful invisible evil.
And so the thing would be left David Fincher a low profile director has in his curriculum good income generated films (Fight Club, 1999) and others pleased to criticism (Se7en, 1995). Two things I like in hollywood . It is also a cool type who enjoys working with the music industry from time to time by music for some well-known artists (see Vogue of Madonna ). Add a couple of light producers, as Kevin Spacey , and as a musical surprise to Trent Reznor . Shake and we have a product with few likely to fail, "he said any of those executives.
I do not cheat. The idea was generate a product that passed all quality control (audience, critics, industry, people on facebook ) without bothering anyone and that generate at least a couple hundred million dollars of the five hundred million potential users of facebook. So.
However, nobody thought it was going to do better than it was planned. The
Social Network proved a remarkable film, the point of being considered by many the movie of the year.
Nobody thought that the performance of Jesse be so magnetic, so successful in presenting themselves as a kind of anti - hero that nevertheless, admired, and above all, fear.
Nobody thought that would be as decent supporting roles and that even the Justin is would look to give us a credible version of himself as an actor and the role that represented, or that the commitment of the director used to Armie Hammer to the dual role of twins Winklevoss be so successful as the inclusion of Trent Reznor the project.
David Fincher with their work, managed to get the discussion first motivations of this film, and has done so well that, although we know, you can not take any credit. While
The Social Network does not show the truth on facebook early , nor is it an objective view of facts used as the basis, reveals part of how using universal themes subgetivos although (like everything in the film) humanize the film.
Friendship ambition, arrogance, betrayal ... some words that the film shows us an impressive pace, using the sacred resource flashback to grab our attention with every passing second. Aaron wove a seamless script, very consistent with the address.
The soundtrack is superior. A range of synthesized sounds seeking to enhance the images and synchronize with the rhythm of the assembly which in turn is determined by the camera, or by the direction of Fincher. Trent secured a Oscar ® in their windows.
No, not a new Pirates of Silicon Valley , no. This film, Network The Social is well told and superbly-dash-directed. And nobody had it, especially me. I must admit
The Social Network is not bad. Besides all that entails use, mention or include the name of facebook is an outstanding movie.
I must say that David Fincher is a serious candidate for Oscar ® for Best Director.
I will not applaud her standing up, because despite its good not the kind of film that deserves a standing ovation, but it deserves some applause Why? Because I tried to be hard on her exposing its commercial motivation to take advantage of the popularity of the network referred to by fully industrialized how to prepare the project hooks in its distribution to ensure hearing, the subjective form of addressing the issue itself -the origin of the idea, as a sample of the culture wannebe and be condescending with one version of the facts giving the impression - intensional or not that well it all happened.
Yes, I tried to be tough, and yet I ended up giving him some applause.
is not a film that deserves five stars - Peter Travers 're a toady ! - But deserves consideration apart of this group of films that have the same intentions (making money) and do not pass to be mediocre.
To me, despite how good it may be, it does Serme very uncomfortable and even suspicious, perhaps because it is facebook ...
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Free Bill Of Sale Template For Car In Ontario
In Mexico, at the institutional level, no other entity has more credibility than the military. If anything could be equated with the Catholic Church.
elite Corps of brave men and delivered to a real conviction, has faced at various times-and still-episodes that are intended for no reason, reflect on their act and further reduce its sphere of influence in daily life.
big mistake is because the army considered unfair yet and the number of coups that Mexico experienced in the nineteenth century. Always had the unfair and last name. It is they, and only they, who should be poorly remembered.
For a serious approach is Unfair awarded to the brave army and organized crime logical reaction to the daily battle that is undertaken. Comfortable is coining from an international office adjectives as "inhuman" an institution like few plays an altruistic increasingly facing a disaster of catastrophic proportions. becomes Irresponsible who with the bias of politicking on his back, bet to exhibit weaknesses without doing anything-can-do to correct them.
Make no mistake, the army is not a deity, is not infallible, is prone to make mistakes, and has committed, as all the various fields of action, which desevuelve. That does not make
forced the "troops" should return to the barracks leaving "media war" well be won or lost next presidential succession. It is simple and eternal with rhetoric as the evil of drug trafficking will end. True, it is imperative to resume the education and values \u200b\u200bas a basic tool to combat the scourge, but whereas the seed bears fruit, the army can not just return "plant trees" to "attend without receiving solidarity to victims, " to " adult literacy. " No, this is not their primary mission .
Mexico should go for recognizing their valuables, which is good and what is wrong, indeed reverse trends and committing to stop the deception that the political class should disseminate, after all their needs are not the same as the ordinary citizen. Did not the Congress who dared to change the patterns of national military service, making today incapable of firing a gun, thousands of Mexicans? Was not this the measure that ended the possibility that "sons of the fatherland" have minimal access to instruction and discipline strategy that could well help other aspect of life and to preserve the nation itself?
speech is true that enhances peace and has its value, but both yesterday and today mixture helplessness, ignorance not only creates risks, but it subjects the sufferer. Forced
is thinking about who or who, within and without benefit of an army stunted, weak and discredited. Forget
taboos. Look at reality. Honor to whom deserves placing everything in its place, distinguishing the good from the bad. Identify the actual real wolf and sheep. Let's give the military's treatment has gained risking his own life. He earns more than he lost.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Przysłowie : Kto Nie Rad
Winter's Bone
The film is difficult to explain ... and you know who is encouraged to read my opinions for me to say film always say more to film camera, instruct, disclose, edit and design. film is something else.
I could choose, I happened to be born in a country where the film comes little late or not coming. And that, for those who enjoy the whole ritual of watching films (dark room, big screen, popcorn, projector light, good movie, etc ...) is a tragedy. Alternatives such as film plays clubs, rent videos, internet or pirates, yes, pirates. So the awards season serves as a showcase for some of film made in the world.
Winter's Bone came to me by the alternative pathway. His appearance at Sundance 2010 with good reviews deserved attention, but his nomination has been ® 2010 Oscar for best picture which accelerated the search process ( Irreversible came to me four years after its release .)
Winter's Bone is independent film-indie-the good, costs a little money and have quality. A film that looks more than anything else, express, tell stories. A serious cinema, but not so pretentious to-learn, Lars Von Trier.
Here, the camera faces the story of a girl of 17 who are forced by circumstances to become unwanted household head at all costs and to investigate the possible location of his father or his father's body to avoid being evicted from a property that was placed as collateral for bail before a judge. A situation that depicts social drama, and it is, but brilliantly unfolds like a thriller, while modern Western drama track in no time.
Culpa of that achievement, as well as the direction-slow, patient, and the script, has Jennifer Lawrence, the young actress who plays the indomitable teen should draw strength from the misery around him, without complaint.
his face faithfully conveys the cruelty of the story that unfolds smoothly. His voice gradually hurt the viewer knows to bleed for it. His nomination to his young age, it is most fitting that the Academy ® could do this year-a pity that there is Natalie. Imagine the amount of footage and resources used to achieve this performance-merit of the address.
Violence marginalization, powerlessness, suffering ... words that are present throughout the film but did not decorate it just serves as a stage for shaping the film's main idea: follow the girl in your search.
few elements that reproach. Perhaps the slow initial development may despair to those accustomed to three shots and outcome or 3D , but I do not. Perhaps some would seem that one or another minor character, or insufficient. It seems to me that all squared, especially John Hawkes, who plays the father's brother disappeared. This also nominated as best supporting actor.
Winter's Bone is one of the best movies I've seen this year, and last year, "and curse not having seen as it should (dark room, big screen, etc ...) but what are you going to do?
Less than two million budget needed for this film. A figure of fear for my pocket-cinema-paid accounts, but a paltry sum for the millions who daily throw in movies that are just looking for accounts pay-as Avatar.
lower it and view it link or better yet, see it on film. I recommend it.
The film is difficult to explain ... and you know who is encouraged to read my opinions for me to say film always say more to film camera, instruct, disclose, edit and design. film is something else.
I could choose, I happened to be born in a country where the film comes little late or not coming. And that, for those who enjoy the whole ritual of watching films (dark room, big screen, popcorn, projector light, good movie, etc ...) is a tragedy. Alternatives such as film plays clubs, rent videos, internet or pirates, yes, pirates. So the awards season serves as a showcase for some of film made in the world.
Winter's Bone came to me by the alternative pathway. His appearance at Sundance 2010 with good reviews deserved attention, but his nomination has been ® 2010 Oscar for best picture which accelerated the search process ( Irreversible came to me four years after its release .)
Winter's Bone is independent film-indie-the good, costs a little money and have quality. A film that looks more than anything else, express, tell stories. A serious cinema, but not so pretentious to-learn, Lars Von Trier.
Here, the camera faces the story of a girl of 17 who are forced by circumstances to become unwanted household head at all costs and to investigate the possible location of his father or his father's body to avoid being evicted from a property that was placed as collateral for bail before a judge. A situation that depicts social drama, and it is, but brilliantly unfolds like a thriller, while modern Western drama track in no time.
Culpa of that achievement, as well as the direction-slow, patient, and the script, has Jennifer Lawrence, the young actress who plays the indomitable teen should draw strength from the misery around him, without complaint.
his face faithfully conveys the cruelty of the story that unfolds smoothly. His voice gradually hurt the viewer knows to bleed for it. His nomination to his young age, it is most fitting that the Academy ® could do this year-a pity that there is Natalie. Imagine the amount of footage and resources used to achieve this performance-merit of the address.
Violence marginalization, powerlessness, suffering ... words that are present throughout the film but did not decorate it just serves as a stage for shaping the film's main idea: follow the girl in your search.
few elements that reproach. Perhaps the slow initial development may despair to those accustomed to three shots and outcome or 3D , but I do not. Perhaps some would seem that one or another minor character, or insufficient. It seems to me that all squared, especially John Hawkes, who plays the father's brother disappeared. This also nominated as best supporting actor.
Winter's Bone is one of the best movies I've seen this year, and last year, "and curse not having seen as it should (dark room, big screen, etc ...) but what are you going to do?
Less than two million budget needed for this film. A figure of fear for my pocket-cinema-paid accounts, but a paltry sum for the millions who daily throw in movies that are just looking for accounts pay-as Avatar.
lower it and view it link or better yet, see it on film. I recommend it.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Wedding Cards Wording With Valima
Pellicer.
A 34-year departure, Mass Opinion reminds American Poet: Carlos Pellicer Camara and shared their heartbreak, perhaps suffered . The same indifference, perhaps in the background, something you have (still) love.
The first sorrow has come
your eyes were indifferent to the mine. Your hands shook
not my hands.
I kissed you and your face was dry stone heights virgins.
Your lips locked in his prison
my first bitter useless.
in vain to put your head on my shoulder and in vain
kissed your eyes. You were cruel
oasis that poisoned the water and went mad with thirst.
And he lifted the horizon a cloud.
flew his swarthy color.
was again darkening the tone of the old days.
I left your face and my hands away yours.
My voice was silent.
silence was horrible rotten fruit.
I heard in my throat encountered defeat
with fatal stones. I
covered my eyes not to see the tears fleeing to me.
Then you kissed me, said something.
I heard my own tears mourn
in the first silence of the first sorrow.
The soul of that day came from far-your soul-
and stayed in my chest.
your eyes were indifferent to the mine. Your hands shook
not my hands.
I kissed you and your face was dry stone heights virgins.
Your lips locked in his prison
my first bitter useless.
in vain to put your head on my shoulder and in vain
kissed your eyes. You were cruel
oasis that poisoned the water and went mad with thirst.
And he lifted the horizon a cloud.
flew his swarthy color.
was again darkening the tone of the old days.
I left your face and my hands away yours.
My voice was silent.
silence was horrible rotten fruit.
I heard in my throat encountered defeat
with fatal stones. I
covered my eyes not to see the tears fleeing to me.
Then you kissed me, said something.
I heard my own tears mourn
in the first silence of the first sorrow.
The soul of that day came from far-your soul-
and stayed in my chest.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Gta Sa Car Transporter
just friendship.
Iván Gómez Triano
The
friendship is undoubtedly the value with more relevant to human life. Thanks to her great achievements have been possible. The convergence of concerns and ideals that shapes the solidarity among equal or unequal, is simply superlative expression of friendship. So sublime is the friendship that Aristotle
spent time in particular in its breadth and depth studies. reason? By up to him, the only true value
which humans should aspire. Gift from the gods and under the man who exercises it.
was in his Nicomachean Ethics, where he laid out his master Hellenic thinking about friendship. Interest pleasure and goodness, are the elements to measure or distinguish between a valuable friendship or not. who offers or receives an interest solely by friendship, can not expect that it transcends or last. The limited interest in automatic, or that they obtained, there is no reason to continue with the fictional relationship of friendship. friendship whose axis is limited to pleasure, it will not be lasting, says the Greek master, the reason is due to the temporary nature of the goods offered that, in addition to the feasibility of that anyone else can offer the same or similar pleasure. In the latter case, pleasure and interest converge. Thus, the lack of interest arise pleasure until then received, the reason to continue the friendly relationship is unsustainable. is then only in relation whose axis is the goodness
, where true friendship can emerge.
In fact, only those who kindly observed to his friend, can understand even in a situation between unequals, the least favored of friends-whether material or spiritual inequality. The other kind friend without hurting includes, without obtaining profit, on the contrary lead him, it monitors, it sponsors.
Friendship is therefore the renunciation of self, for us. Is to give rather than receive, even, and without exaggeration, the life itself.
The history of war suffered exemplified by mankind as soon as stated. During the strife of war, is when, ironically, mainly flowers that type of friendship, the true, that based on goodness. The warrior finds pleasure in every day to stay alive and to this end, it requires solidarity with fellow battle. The parent who raises the child, is another example.
The father is pleasure and interest in training their offspring, regardless of the results. During this process only moves the goodness, hence, any child can never claim the father of all, on the contrary he should and not a little thing, is it.
Then, when the friendship is based on goodness, it is possible to get as much pleasure as sharing interests with friends, whether appropriate lead or be led, teach or be taught, support or be helped, be an example or follow the example. Hellenic thinker
After a simple man but great while, called Jesus said there is no better love than that of a friend, as the true friend is available to deliver even one who loves life: apparent reference to the friendship based on kindness.
Go then to all my good friends, of yesterday and today, present and ubiquitous, a big hug and fraternal greetings, with a sincere appreciation for the times I have been able to spend and which have been built my existence. Special mention and thanks
for my first friends: The Creator, my earthly parents, my dear brother and of course, Ivan Adolfo Nicolás my most recent friends, never forget them.
Religion, Independence and Union.
spent time in particular in its breadth and depth studies. reason? By up to him, the only true value
which humans should aspire. Gift from the gods and under the man who exercises it.
was in his Nicomachean Ethics, where he laid out his master Hellenic thinking about friendship. Interest pleasure and goodness, are the elements to measure or distinguish between a valuable friendship or not. who offers or receives an interest solely by friendship, can not expect that it transcends or last. The limited interest in automatic, or that they obtained, there is no reason to continue with the fictional relationship of friendship. friendship whose axis is limited to pleasure, it will not be lasting, says the Greek master, the reason is due to the temporary nature of the goods offered that, in addition to the feasibility of that anyone else can offer the same or similar pleasure. In the latter case, pleasure and interest converge. Thus, the lack of interest arise pleasure until then received, the reason to continue the friendly relationship is unsustainable. is then only in relation whose axis is the goodness
, where true friendship can emerge.
In fact, only those who kindly observed to his friend, can understand even in a situation between unequals, the least favored of friends-whether material or spiritual inequality. The other kind friend without hurting includes, without obtaining profit, on the contrary lead him, it monitors, it sponsors.
Friendship is therefore the renunciation of self, for us. Is to give rather than receive, even, and without exaggeration, the life itself.
The history of war suffered exemplified by mankind as soon as stated. During the strife of war, is when, ironically, mainly flowers that type of friendship, the true, that based on goodness. The warrior finds pleasure in every day to stay alive and to this end, it requires solidarity with fellow battle. The parent who raises the child, is another example.
The father is pleasure and interest in training their offspring, regardless of the results. During this process only moves the goodness, hence, any child can never claim the father of all, on the contrary he should and not a little thing, is it.
Then, when the friendship is based on goodness, it is possible to get as much pleasure as sharing interests with friends, whether appropriate lead or be led, teach or be taught, support or be helped, be an example or follow the example. Hellenic thinker
After a simple man but great while, called Jesus said there is no better love than that of a friend, as the true friend is available to deliver even one who loves life: apparent reference to the friendship based on kindness.
Go then to all my good friends, of yesterday and today, present and ubiquitous, a big hug and fraternal greetings, with a sincere appreciation for the times I have been able to spend and which have been built my existence. Special mention and thanks
for my first friends: The Creator, my earthly parents, my dear brother and of course, Ivan Adolfo Nicolás my most recent friends, never forget them.
Religion, Independence and Union.
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Sean Connery Workout For James Bond
The King's Speech: A speech and more
season
Oscar ® is like ducks or deer season in the regions where they are allowed to hunt on occasion, with the difference that in this case no rifles or chance, but critical views and specific films.
The King's Speech managed to get into this exclusive list of the best films of the year as members of the Academy ® , this group of individuals who pay an annuity for certain privileges and considerations and where there is a small group I really do not know the work being done in the industry because of it up or extra light gauge known, but of filmmaking, or transmit through those twenty-four frames per second a idea or intention of something else. A more can be anything or nothing. That
something that is sometimes not clearly seen is what I wish to make this a historical film that tells the circumstances under which George VI the UK came to the throne and his fight against insecurity and stuttering have the support of his wife and an unorthodox therapist.
Almost the entire film takes place on the preparation of this mortal so he can talk in public without stuttering and more the time this is crowned as king, because a king must have something to say and that something must be clear and deeper, at the time where radio was the only medium where voices heard and felt.
A speech. So the story begins. A bad speech said, stuttering, embarrassing.
And the film also ends with a speech. This time, a solemn speech. A speech which, although not enough, change the course of the history of a nation.
Therein lies the power and greatness of this film. Therein lies the burden of why is still so considered by those few people who know that the filmmaking and not just make movies, that is not equal or the same.
Technically the film is neither innovative nor remarkable in any case. It is a waste, but not the eighth wonder of the world. The costumes, photography, installation and setting have been made to the English, attention to detail so as not to be either pretentious or sloppy, which is something he should be applauded to the production that director. Thus, again highlight what makes this film so strong is that more showing us.
I'm not English, and so there are some situations presented in the film which I am not familiar with, and not created anyone reading these lines I've walked in virtual libraries by comparing dates, data, or names, no, not that. But one need not be English to understand the humanity of that mortal featured in the movie: a man, with the privilege of being born into a royal family, with uncertainty in their ability to be more what he believes can be. A man with an impending doom at the gates, his coronation, a looming war, refuses to accept that it is capable of being more of what he and everyone knows it is: a stutterer.
No wonder. Almost always a problem speech has been regarded as a problem of mental disability and often tend to think that because someone speaks well has a huge brain capacity because someone can not express is silly. Well, that's exactly what happens in the film.
If we forget that this is a king and we focus on the fact that it is a human, perhaps the thing did not have much grace or not you would find meaning to the subject. But I there a future king who is afraid of public speaking and as a governor antithesis-Hitler-with a charisma and ability to corner the masses with words of his speeches. A governor whose words were able to burn the metes of a nation and that was to point of submitting a whole Europe Nazism.
And that is where the issue becomes solemn. And for that, the writer and director used the film only resource that enables them to: images. A scene where the king sees newly promoted a discourse of Adolf Hitler where he talks to his troops effusively shows the true intent of the film, the purity of the final idea of \u200b\u200bthe film, yes. The King's Speech (The king's speech) is an ode to the value of a human being who accepts his fate despite his weaknesses and imperfections and faced with courage, supported by those who believed in him.
So that speech, the final speech of the movie, and the way it has been made into a film, should be taken into account when assessing this film could be just one more film, but not is.
was the speech of a mortal overcoming their fears with his calm voice, but determined to triumph over itself that encouraged a nation to maintain resistance Nazi Empire during World War II.
the end, if you want to see this as a fable, the awful stutter, his voice, he kept on fighting an entire nation in the fierce oratory of a man who had also built a system with his voice and charisma.
He beat the stutter.
one day I told a friend that this awards means nothing more than a sympathy vote. There is a movie that can compare with another. I believe that until today have not understood me very well.
The King's Speech has the same gene that had at the time Chariots of Fire in 1981 beat Reds in award for best film of the year, without being visually more powerful than the work of Warren Beatty . Or when Driving Miss Daisy left without the best picture statuette for Born on the Fourth of July, the favorite in 1989. So, in spite of the favorites, visually speaking, Black Swan, The Social Network-not surprise me to see the night of the delivery man says and the Oscar goes to ... The King's Speech.
Three actors supporting the weight of a message and a story to tell: Colin Firth , as the king; Geoffrey Rush , as the therapist who helps the king with his problem and Helena Bonham Carter , as the wife of the king. Everyone deserves extra applause to the other in competition.
Definitely, this film be saved to the selected corner of my preferences for the solemn and strong in his message, despite being so discreet in the way of presenting.
I recommend it.
season
Oscar ® is like ducks or deer season in the regions where they are allowed to hunt on occasion, with the difference that in this case no rifles or chance, but critical views and specific films.
The King's Speech managed to get into this exclusive list of the best films of the year as members of the Academy ® , this group of individuals who pay an annuity for certain privileges and considerations and where there is a small group I really do not know the work being done in the industry because of it up or extra light gauge known, but of filmmaking, or transmit through those twenty-four frames per second a idea or intention of something else. A more can be anything or nothing. That
something that is sometimes not clearly seen is what I wish to make this a historical film that tells the circumstances under which George VI the UK came to the throne and his fight against insecurity and stuttering have the support of his wife and an unorthodox therapist.
Almost the entire film takes place on the preparation of this mortal so he can talk in public without stuttering and more the time this is crowned as king, because a king must have something to say and that something must be clear and deeper, at the time where radio was the only medium where voices heard and felt.
A speech. So the story begins. A bad speech said, stuttering, embarrassing.
And the film also ends with a speech. This time, a solemn speech. A speech which, although not enough, change the course of the history of a nation.
Therein lies the power and greatness of this film. Therein lies the burden of why is still so considered by those few people who know that the filmmaking and not just make movies, that is not equal or the same.
Technically the film is neither innovative nor remarkable in any case. It is a waste, but not the eighth wonder of the world. The costumes, photography, installation and setting have been made to the English, attention to detail so as not to be either pretentious or sloppy, which is something he should be applauded to the production that director. Thus, again highlight what makes this film so strong is that more showing us.
I'm not English, and so there are some situations presented in the film which I am not familiar with, and not created anyone reading these lines I've walked in virtual libraries by comparing dates, data, or names, no, not that. But one need not be English to understand the humanity of that mortal featured in the movie: a man, with the privilege of being born into a royal family, with uncertainty in their ability to be more what he believes can be. A man with an impending doom at the gates, his coronation, a looming war, refuses to accept that it is capable of being more of what he and everyone knows it is: a stutterer.
No wonder. Almost always a problem speech has been regarded as a problem of mental disability and often tend to think that because someone speaks well has a huge brain capacity because someone can not express is silly. Well, that's exactly what happens in the film.
If we forget that this is a king and we focus on the fact that it is a human, perhaps the thing did not have much grace or not you would find meaning to the subject. But I there a future king who is afraid of public speaking and as a governor antithesis-Hitler-with a charisma and ability to corner the masses with words of his speeches. A governor whose words were able to burn the metes of a nation and that was to point of submitting a whole Europe Nazism.
And that is where the issue becomes solemn. And for that, the writer and director used the film only resource that enables them to: images. A scene where the king sees newly promoted a discourse of Adolf Hitler where he talks to his troops effusively shows the true intent of the film, the purity of the final idea of \u200b\u200bthe film, yes. The King's Speech (The king's speech) is an ode to the value of a human being who accepts his fate despite his weaknesses and imperfections and faced with courage, supported by those who believed in him.
So that speech, the final speech of the movie, and the way it has been made into a film, should be taken into account when assessing this film could be just one more film, but not is.
was the speech of a mortal overcoming their fears with his calm voice, but determined to triumph over itself that encouraged a nation to maintain resistance Nazi Empire during World War II.
the end, if you want to see this as a fable, the awful stutter, his voice, he kept on fighting an entire nation in the fierce oratory of a man who had also built a system with his voice and charisma.
He beat the stutter.
one day I told a friend that this awards means nothing more than a sympathy vote. There is a movie that can compare with another. I believe that until today have not understood me very well.
The King's Speech has the same gene that had at the time Chariots of Fire in 1981 beat Reds in award for best film of the year, without being visually more powerful than the work of Warren Beatty . Or when Driving Miss Daisy left without the best picture statuette for Born on the Fourth of July, the favorite in 1989. So, in spite of the favorites, visually speaking, Black Swan, The Social Network-not surprise me to see the night of the delivery man says and the Oscar goes to ... The King's Speech.
Three actors supporting the weight of a message and a story to tell: Colin Firth , as the king; Geoffrey Rush , as the therapist who helps the king with his problem and Helena Bonham Carter , as the wife of the king. Everyone deserves extra applause to the other in competition.
Definitely, this film be saved to the selected corner of my preferences for the solemn and strong in his message, despite being so discreet in the way of presenting.
I recommend it.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Faishon Chanal Midnight Hot
attached statement and photographs of Senator Francisco Javier Castellón Fonseca in his meeting yesterday with other Senators to discuss the ACT where dfinió Castellón the calendar of meetings and public consultations were conducted with organizations civil society, academics, specialists and representatives of public and private sectors to discuss the implications for Mexico to sign this international agreement.
hope the information is of interest and may be published in their respective media.
no more by the time I leave thanking them for their hospitality and putting at their disposal.
having good day.
Grissel Herrera
Social Communication
Senator Francisco Javier Castellón Fonseca
Server List Tibia Exp X99999
}
Lead. The word lead is not registered in dictionaries but lead (lead or be at the head of a group, political party, a competition, etc.). Therefore, correct conjugation of the verb be, for example, leads , not liderea.
Source: Royal English Academy, www.rae.es . (FFS, 5 / 30).
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Versİon 1.011 Mount & Blade Serİal Number
Check your shoes A little salt
happens that one goes around in life feel a smell of shit everywhere without knowing exactly where it comes from, and worst of all, not knowing where to go.
You know that shit because it has just plain screw up is a human process inevitable. The cagamos often, very often, but, as with the physiological shit, do not pay much attention, either because they just hauled the lever or press a button and shit going to stop until Patagonia or because, like a cat, bury the waste to avoid responsibility ...
However, it sometimes happens that the smell of shit we sought to invade our privacy, our thoughts and we suspect all that by order of the destination or the chaos happening around us.
help
This is where the old memories of childhood when I was not aware that one can go screwing up in life, when I devoted solely to shit in the morning or when the stomach and intestines friends conspired against me. These days when he shared a desk with a colleague and occasional, very occasionally, he was a smell of shit -in those days could only say poo - and without much complication surrounding us we used to check shoes.
Dogs are not like cats, and thank God I am not an atheist, they are nothing like humans. Dogs do not hide your shit like cats, and if one does not look good for where he is walking, can be in your shoes or sandals, some stools.
Carry on shoes dog poop has never been so horrible as to think that this shit was a complex human being without much urgency or decided to make street an escape to their feces, or as I like to say, his shit.
The human shit is the most disgusting of all.
Thinking it was always dog poo, or is, rather than thinking it is human feces, and is much less complicated than thought, or rather ask will my own shit? Have I filled my shoes on my own shit? Dilemma ...
Yes, sometimes, on the road, without thought, nor seek, nor want it, we can fill some of our own shit, or worse, filled with some shit and not be sure whether their own or is others. And I will not explain what I mean shit.
in doubt, check our shoes to keep watering microparticles should walk this shit mentioned everywhere ...
Yes, sir W-X there are no men here, I am writing another many times that word. What you gonna do?
happens that one goes around in life feel a smell of shit everywhere without knowing exactly where it comes from, and worst of all, not knowing where to go.
You know that shit because it has just plain screw up is a human process inevitable. The cagamos often, very often, but, as with the physiological shit, do not pay much attention, either because they just hauled the lever or press a button and shit going to stop until Patagonia or because, like a cat, bury the waste to avoid responsibility ...
However, it sometimes happens that the smell of shit we sought to invade our privacy, our thoughts and we suspect all that by order of the destination or the chaos happening around us.
help
This is where the old memories of childhood when I was not aware that one can go screwing up in life, when I devoted solely to shit in the morning or when the stomach and intestines friends conspired against me. These days when he shared a desk with a colleague and occasional, very occasionally, he was a smell of shit -in those days could only say poo - and without much complication surrounding us we used to check shoes.
Dogs are not like cats, and thank God I am not an atheist, they are nothing like humans. Dogs do not hide your shit like cats, and if one does not look good for where he is walking, can be in your shoes or sandals, some stools.
Carry on shoes dog poop has never been so horrible as to think that this shit was a complex human being without much urgency or decided to make street an escape to their feces, or as I like to say, his shit.
The human shit is the most disgusting of all.
Thinking it was always dog poo, or is, rather than thinking it is human feces, and is much less complicated than thought, or rather ask will my own shit? Have I filled my shoes on my own shit? Dilemma ...
Yes, sometimes, on the road, without thought, nor seek, nor want it, we can fill some of our own shit, or worse, filled with some shit and not be sure whether their own or is others. And I will not explain what I mean shit.
in doubt, check our shoes to keep watering microparticles should walk this shit mentioned everywhere ...
Yes, sir W-X there are no men here, I am writing another many times that word. What you gonna do?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)