Triano Hugo Gomez. From different angles, the amendment passed a few hours ago by the Senate to "strengthen" the National Commission and State Human Rights sounds like "good thing" , though in truth, the amendment is still far from making someone say: Mission accomplished.
There can be no such claim until eradicate vices and ills own action, beyond the spirit of the law.
It is possible that while they consider a success withdraw to the Court the power to hear and resolve issues allegedly in violation of "higher rights of being" in our country, someone cares about now is the criterion of a "Commissioner" and his advisers, which determine what acts shall be considered as such.
Not that I doubt the good faith necessary to address these issues, or legal capacity of those now in charge of these reviews, the fact is that despite the "hint" background is hard to imagine an Ombudsman "confront" a Presidential Power , when a trial reaches its field. Whatever the Court to be a child of the same level as the Federal Executive, seemed to have greater weight and therefore likely "real" out unscathed, in a possible "dispute" . Amen
that once again the role of prosecutors will be crucial in the integration of the case file to review, it is assumed that a minister can have more elements to be of legal resources than any visitor or counselor of the body concerned.
to that the amount was the full court with its 11 members, which assumed responsibility for their decisions on the matter, should be observed that in the case of the NHRC will serve less than 1 criterion, because According to the Human Rights Act force, there are 10 members of the advisory board, the body responsible for setting general policy guidelines of the National- and also all under the same standard, may include as rows with 3 members at public expense. Or what is the same, these 3 could be part-plus-one judges have indicated dependence violated human rights.
A further analysis suggests the claim that the reform, the NHRC and state-level counterparts " and have teeth" . While "something" to have won hereafter by law to receive a response based on who refuses to abide by its recommendations, it does not mean that end, they themselves are -binding.
That is, no entity can simply ignore observed as now-a Human Rights Commissions, will have to tell the reason at the expense of the Senate or the Standing Committee of the General Congress intervenes for the sake of explanation. There is no obligation to comply or object, whether to meet the recommendation.
Basically, if we talk teeth, the NHRC and its counterparts have even milk. Again the attitudes their "guardians" that calcium give you the strength needed to replace that.
will certainly draw attention to the role they will serve after the official adoption of the reform, the Human Rights Commission in Tabasco, that despite the progress and efforts of the Government remains on duty appendix, caring and trying an image and an institutional relationship that often borders on submission.
be interesting to see the actions of Manuel Argáez to similar cases have already occurred. When the government with their riot gear prevented or statements to avoid being wrong with the visitor in turn, when the attorney in front on the eve or in the process electoral torture allegations and even an education system accused of discrimination by a gay student . The time undoubtedly will place everyone in their perfect size.
0 comments:
Post a Comment