Sashiel Ricardo Rivera Pizarro .
Since 2008, official and legally Tabasco came transparency. Whether for fashion or for some other reason, but better times, it warned, had started in our state.
With the new tool is expected a new era of "accountability" as which we have heard but knew little practice. However, after a long journey, three years away, some might say that we like, or maybe worse than before.
Today, unfortunately the issue of transparency is more than force in the agenda not local or unwanted advances the interest of the authorities in fulfilling their obligations, but by the attitude of "some" that over the systems continue to avoid enacted to make public information available to all citizens. Today we are seeing, from afar, how the attitude of the Ministry of State Administration and Finance jettisoned the so called transparency than many assume with a simple "no" , has avoided public and transparent information is "sundry debtors account" last year and at other times has been made public.
Without going into an analysis of what is behind the above account, which many say is part of the "gap" financing, or legal issue that has already reached the area of \u200b\u200badministrative fines and nearly criminal, the issue is not somewhat lower. In the end, and as usual, those affected are citizens, far from being interested in the account debtors of the State Government, would be about to be victims of a violation of their constitutional rights, the access to information stipulated under concept of "maximum disclosure" in article six, and today it would be trampled by a simple executive position which tried to impose on the autonomy of an institution, a legal and rolling by opening the door for other "obligated" do the same.
The outcome of this "legal melodrama" should interest us all, and even if we have never made use of transparency, as this would be a step towards backward, which some say, esatatal regime has brought the issue. Another step that can only be understood when reviewing cases such as the "bond fatigue" that were only open to the public after a "tiresome" process of public pressure, the delayed entry into force of the law of matter, corrected by the Supreme Court, cases such as the monthly salary of the Governor Granier who from the outset made it clear that liability would only public, and others, as the loan of 4 billion pesos.
A as things stand, in 2012 they will try to sell a product transparency as electioneering along with others, such as a "democracy" and always referred "honesty" and the "social justice" . Depend who accept each purchase.
Thus, subject to something "miraculous" happens, the only hope of Tabasco is hoped that the transition to the next government will assume a new and better position on the matter, in addition to not be lost sight of how the new directors of ITAIP, to be elected in May, exercise their powers. If not, as someone already said, why have a high school costing 28 million pesos to the treasury each year?
0 comments:
Post a Comment